Showing posts with label Afghanistan. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Afghanistan. Show all posts

Mar 29, 2010

Robert Fowler blasts Harper's foreign policy

Robert Fowler

Robert Fowler is Canada's longest standing ambassador to the UN and a former foreign policy adviser to Trudeau, Turner and Mulroney.

Speaking at a Montreal conference organized by the Liberal Party of Canada, Fowler said that Harper's foreign policy has made the international community suspicious and distrustful of a Canada that is increasingly turning away from the world.

A report in the Ottawa Citizen had this comment:

Former Canadian diplomat Robert Fowler has slammed Prime Minister Stephen Harper’s foreign policy, accusing the Conservatives of pandering to Canadian Jewish voters with a “reckless” Middle East policy that blindly favors Israel.

He said the Conservatives must “accept the reality and importance of the ironclad link between . . . continuing turmoil and volatility in the Middle East and the rise (and) growing strength of international terrorism.”

But, he said, doing that means confronting Israel, as it “builds ever more settlements in illegally occupied territories in contravention of a myriad of international judgments.”


Fowler is keenly aware of the erosion in Canada's standing on the global stage as a result of Harperite policies.

Ottawa Citizen:

He [Fowler] said politicians are merely engaged in “the scramble to lock up the Jewish vote in Canada (and) selling out our widely admired and long-established reputation for fairness and justice... I do deplore the abandonment of our hard-won reputation for objective analysis and decency as a result of our reckless Middle Eastern posturing”.

Fowler was also critical of the Liberal Party and said that today "they don't stand for much in the way of principles".

CBC:

"I have the impression that they will endorse anything and everything which might return them to power and nothing which won't, whatever the merits of either. It's all about getting to power, and it shows.

"I believe Liberals seem prepared to embrace an infinite array of special interests in order to shill for votes rather than forging a broad-based principled alliance founded in deep Liberal traditions, one with a distinct social contract and an independent Canadian character, which would protect, project and defend core Liberal values at home and abroad..."


The former ambassador took aim at the Canadian presence in Afghanistan and called for a withdrawal.

Even Harper seems to believe that "we will not prevail in Afghanistan". On a visit to the US the PM said that the Taleban cannot be defeated. So why are Canadian troops paying the price for a policy that could turn out to be self-defeating? Why are young Canadian service people being sacrificed... to what end? Fowler is right when he says there is no way Canada can ever afford the price "in blood and treasure" to essentially help colonize Afghanistan.

Fowler said Canadian troops should withdraw immediately. "It is time to leave. Not a moment, not a life, and not a dollar later".

Link also to Globe and Mail and CBC

Mar 7, 2009

Former SAS commander says Afghanistan operation 'worthless'

Photobucket

Former SAS commander, Major Sebastian Morley, said recently that the UK's effort in Afghanistan is "worthless". He also said that the situation in Afghanistan is similar to the start of the Vietnam war.

Morley had a sobering assessment of the situation on the ground:

This is the equivalent to the start of the Vietnam conflict, there is much more to come.

We hold tiny areas of ground in Helmand and we are kidding ourselves if we think our influence goes beyond 500 metres of our security bases.

We go out on operations, have a punch-up with the Taleban and then go back to camp for tea. We are not holding the ground.


Major Morley resigned after Cpl Sarah Bryant and three colleagues were killed when their Snatch Land Rover hit an anti-tank mine in Helmand province in June 2008.

The SAS commander says he was compelled to stand down after Quentin Davis, British minister for Defence Equipment and Support told an "unacceptable lie". At the time Davis stated that commanders had a choice of vehicles.

Major Morley said "There was no other vehicle to use. The simple truth is that the protection on these vehicles (Snatch Land Rover) is inadequate and this led to the unnecessary deaths."

Morley's assessment is brutally honest and speaks to a hard truth about the operation in Afghanistan.

He isn't the first British military commander to speak out. In October 2008, Brigadier Mark Carlton-Smith said the British public should not expect a "decisive military victory". He spoke these words shortly after a leaked memo from a French diplomat claimed that the British ambassador in Kabul, Sir Sherard Cowper-Coles, told him the western strategy was "doomed to fail".

Obama should think long and hard before getting in deeper. Despite increasing the US troop presence he has said he will seek talks with the Taleban. When asked if the US was winning the war in Afghanistan, he replied "No".

The challenges facing Afghanistan will not be solved by military intervention by western powers. More-of-the-same, along with the fantasy of an Afghanistan 'on track' in accordance with the prescription being offered by the west won't succeed.

A determination to get in deeper will result in hundreds, perhaps thousands of more young lives needlessly lost. Families in Afghanistan and the western nations involved will be faced with burying their loved ones for some time to come.

The Soviets retreated from Afghanistan in bitter defeat. Recently Lt General Ruslan Aushev who was part of that operation expressed a skepticism based on hard experience:

We were there for 10 years and we lost more than 14,000 soldiers, but what was the result? Nothing,

Full BBC story here.

Dec 27, 2008

CIA using Viagra to bribe Afghan warlords

Photobucket

The Washington Times reports that CIA agents are offering Viagra and other "gifts" to Afghan warlords in an effort to obtain cooperation in the war against Taliban insurgents.

Some Afghan chieftains have up to four wives. An American official said Viagra is a way to put older tribal leaders with fading libidos back into an "authoritative position."

In justifying the ongoing war effort, the Americans have repeatedly referred to the importance of 'liberating' the women of Afghanistan. Doling out potency enhancing drugs to aging chieftains who view their women as chattel seems a strange way to go about it.

Ten percent of Afghan women die during childbirth. Under-age females are often married off to much older men as payment for a debt or to clinch a deal. Domestic violence and sexual assault is a problem. Young brides unable to deal with forced marriage situations have committed suicide with the aid of gasoline and a match - a phenomena known as 'burning bride syndrome.'

Aside from the obvious therapeutic benefits, doling out Viagra could have a political downside. Afghan warlords are big on their macho credentials. Having rivals discover that their virility is dependent on American-supplied pills might prove to be deflating.

Apr 28, 2007

Canadian Tories deny prisoner abuse allegations

Gordon O'Connor, Canada's Defence Minister, isn't up to the job. Half the time he gives the appearance of being asleep-at-the-wheel, and now we are learning that he isn't clear on the details when it comes to detainee transfers in Afghanistan.

In March O'Connor apologized for leading the House of Commons up the garden path by stating that the Red Cross would release key information to Ottawa relating to alleged abuse of detainees. It turns out that the Red Cross is under no obligation whatever to inform Ottawa of its findings when it comes to the alleged abuse of prisoners handed over to Afghan agencies. Although O'Connor claims his statement was made on good faith, not a few on the opposition benches had difficulty buying that.

Then there is the recent business of an internal Foreign Affairs Department report, which alleges that Afghan agencies to which Canadian forces entrust prisoners, have been engaged in everything from arbitrary arrest, torture and killing, to kidnaps with extortion demands. Similar allegations come from Amnesty International Canada and the British Columbia Civil Liberties Association. Prisoner-transfer logs accessed by the media include details of prisoners with injuries that appear to have been inflicted while they were in Canadian custody.

The response of the Tories to this has been to stonewall. Public Safety Minister Stockwell Day claims these are all false accusations dreamed up by detainees. Harper and O'Connor were quick to join the "rumors and allegations" chorus.

The Afghan organization entrusted by the Harper government with supervising the condition of prisoners is the Afghan Human Rights Commission. It's headed up by Dr Sima Samar, and has logged some 140 violations by coalition forces. Some of these relate to prisoner abuse, but others involve incidents such as forced entry into homes and frisking of women. The Commission lacks teeth and personnel to adequately investigate prisoner abuse, moreover on occasion they have been denied access to detainees.

Foreign Affairs Minister, Peter MacKay, seemed uncomfortable when attempting to explain why members of his department first denied an incriminating report even existed, and then resorted to blacking out comments when the report was finally released. MacKay has gone so far as to admit to reporters that the mission is in trouble. He is on record saying ... "While I don't want to sound alarmist, I think there is going to be a tipping point unless we are able to stabilize (southern Afghanistan)."

After the lessons learned in Iraq, it is inexcusable that the government is engaged in an apparent cover-up of a problem that has serious implications for Canada's international reputation. Harper is deep into denial mode on this. Despite all the criticisms leveled at the Dutch for their alleged shirking of military engagements in preference for working on development projects, they at least covered their rear end by putting in place all the necessary protocols when it came to the handling of detainees.

Nov 21, 2006

The burning brides of Afghanistan

bride,afghanistan,burning

Islamic scholars who argue that the rights of Muslim women are guaranteed by the religion, are quick to point to passages in the Qur'an and Hadiths that speak in lofty and compassionate terms about the role and status of women.

The theme of patriarchal dominance runs throughout Islamic history. This male-centric worldview combined with poverty and a lack of education, frequently leads to conduct toward women that not only runs counter to the teachings of the Prophet, but is a violation of law and of basic humanitarian standards.

Wars in Afghanistan have turned women into pawns, routinely exploited in a power struggle that is exclusively male. The highest Muslim values of womanhood - purity and modesty - have been targeted for hostile attention. In many of the internecine struggles that have taken place in Afghanistan, mujahideen have employed rape as a weapon of war in an effort to demoralize their enemies. Women are regarded by warring parties as little more than pawns to be abused for political and military advantage.

Women are also exploited for the purpose of gaining a propaganda advantage. Male factions are forever proclaiming their rules and regulations for women in the public debate. As a result Afghani women are turned into political chattel, their freedom overruled by males who speak for them and predetermine their destiny.

The plight of women in Afghanistan, is mirrored in other parts of the Islamic world. For example in Pakistan as a result of an archaic "honor code" women are sometimes killed to satisfy family pride. This is considered to be a fit punishment in some circles for bringing shame on the family.

Accusations of "bringing shame" can involve the simple act of leaving an abusive husband or marrying a man of one's choice. Women who are raped through no fault of their own, are frequently regarded as "shame bringers", and so candidates for murder.

The lawyer and human rights activist, Hina Jilani, has this to say of the plight of women in Pakistan ...

"The right to life of women in Pakistan is conditional on their obeying social norms and traditions."


In countries such as Afghanistan, the lives of women has become so degraded that many young women are committing suicide at an alarming rate. In most cases they do this by self-immolation, burning themselves to death with the aid of gas and a match. The official count was 93 for such deaths in 2005. It is believed that many more women are killing themselves in this fashion. Often these tragedies remain unreported due to the family shame and stigma such reports would engender.

Under the Taliban women were treated like inferior beings. This patriarchal attitude toward women still persists. As much as 80% of all marriages in Afghanistan are forced arrangements. In over 50% of these marriages the brides are under 16. Frequently they are forced into marriages with men in their middle years or even older. These female children are used like goods basically, to discharge a debt or as payment for some arrangement or favor.

Many young girls who choose to end their lives with fire, are trapped in marriages with men who are abusive. They can't leave because to do so would bring shame on their families. Their plight becomes so desperate that some see suicide as the only available option. As is the case in Pakistan, the authorities seem to take the attitude that it's the woman's problem when such tragedies occur.

While Islamic scripture accords honor to women, there is a gap between theory and practice. Those who attempt to whitewash the problems that Afghan women face by simply reciting passages of the Qur'an are doing a disservice to these women. It's essential to address the root cause, and this involves challenging the male-centered customs and attitudes that keep many Muslim women in a position of subservience.