Showing posts with label Fox watch. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Fox watch. Show all posts

Jun 1, 2010

Greta Van Susteren polls viewers on her intelligence - and loses

greta van susteren,fox,poll

Fox News host, Greta Van Susteren, was apparently irked by an email she received from a viewer who said she had a "mind like a sieve."

'Brian' from Tahlequah, Oklahoma, also informed Van Susteren that her "brain is empty." He elaborated: "Matter of fact, it is so empty, if you put a pea in your skull it would rattle around like a BB in a boxcar."

Van Susteren decided to take the bait and commented on her blog "Why does Brian watch if he thinks I am so stupid?... How stupid is that????"

She went further and polled the viewing audience on who is dumber - Greta Van S or Brian... the dude who watches a show he claims is hosted by a dimwit?

Perhaps Van Susteren naively imagined her fans would rally in her defence. If so, it was a rash calculation. As of May 29, 78% of the respondents agreed with the view that Van Susteren is dumber than Brian.

Van Susteren posted on her blog Friday that the poll was meant to be "a joke." She said: "Well...turns out that I am now losing the poll but only in the last 18 hours have the votes spiked. It turns out that since midnight, the poll has gotten an inexplicable number of hits even though it is 4 days old... Of course this is now a cyberspace game and I think it funny. I lost."

It's not difficult to understand why 'Brian' might view Van Susteren as challenged. She's not exactly the sharpest knife in the drawer. When she interviews big name guests she comes across like an ingenue, a bit like a kid who appears slightly overawed to be in adult company. She seems more about stroking her guest's ego and facilitating responses than asking hard questions.

Van Susteren's fluffball Alaska interviews with Sarah Palin lacked critical rigor and were mainly about showcasing Palin as an Alaskan chili-making-mom-next-door type who Americans only need to know a little better in order to love. Van Susteren's partisan approach when it came to the Palin interviews speaks poorly of her objectivity as a journalist.

Her down-home persona and distinctive look, add up in the minds of some viewers to credibility. It's her middle-of-the-road facade that makes her approach all the more insidious... after all she works in the Murdoch trenches and is a facilitator of a brand of right-wing ideology that America doesn't need.

Whether or not she has a "mind like a sieve" is open to debate, but there is no doubt that Greta Van Susteren knows how to make her seeming deficits work to her advantage.

Link also to Raw Story - Yahoo News

May 20, 2010

Glenn Beck's ratings take a dive

beck,ratings,fox news

The Glenn Beck show on Fox saw its worst ratings to date on Friday of last week, averaging 1,776 million viewers. A significant bleed considering that Beck's peak audience high was up around the 3.4 million mark.
For the month of April, Glenn Beck suffered his first year-over-year decline since joining Fox News in January 2009, declining 7% in total viewers and 6% in the demo compared to April 2009. Moreover, Beck shed 28% of his audience between January and April in both total viewers and the demo.


Despite the slippage Beck is still ahead of the pack, but recent trends suggest that his hyper-accelerated rise may be slowing.

Beck's more objectionable content... nutball conspiracy theories, his stated belief that Barack Obama is a racist etc... has resulted in advertisers taking a hike, but the audience downturn may be in equal part burnout. How often do you want to watch the same routine? Beck is a one-trick pony and after a while he starts repeating like a bad record.

Beck's numbers are down 30% since the beginning of the year, dropping from 2.9 million to 2.1 million. The erosion may also be due to Beck's more serious self. The showman is less in evidence these days.

He explains: “When we were, and I’ve never told this story before, when we were starting the TV show, there were things that I did that I wouldn’t do now because I had to be more of an entertainer to get people to go what is this show at five o’clock? I never said anything I didn’t believe, but I may have said things in an entertaining fashion.”

Content is less entertaining also. He's been including more God related material. The truly awful Founders' Friday that features a generic looking studio audience is another effort to pull in more viewers. Problem is it is way more boring than "rodeo clown" chalking up a blackboard with end-of-days terms such as "AntiChrist" and "Armageddon."

Eric Boehlert of Media Matters thinks that "Beck mania has peaked." Let's hope so. No matter how the trend pans out Beck will always have a hardcore following of fans who never seem to get enough of his line of bull.

Link also to mediamatters

May 10, 2010

National Prayer Day: Palin does some spinning on O'Reilly

palin,national day of prayer

Sarah Palin appeared via link-up on Bill O'Reilly's Fox soapbox this week to wax indignant about critics of the National Day of Prayer. This is an annual day of observance in the US when people are asked to "to turn to God in prayer and meditation."

Palin claimed that Judeo-Christian belief is the basis for American law and said that the founding fathers intended Americans to "create law based on the God of the bible and the ten commandments." Some statement.

Using language not usually associated with fundamentalist Christians, she said "What in hell scares people about talking about America's foundation of faith?"

It's unclear what history Palin is evoking but for the most part it seems to reference an America in her head. If the Christian faith in the context of the American foundation is as integral as she claims you certainly wouldn't know it from looking over the US Constitution and stated positions by the founders. There's very little in there about religion, God or the bible.

Take Thomas Paine as an instance. In his pamphlet The Age of Reason he wrote: "I do not believe in the creed professed by the Jewish Church, by the Roman Church, by the Greek Church, by the Turkish Church, by the Protestant Church, nor by any Church that I know of. My own mind is my own Church."

John Adams was another founder who kept religion a private matter. In 1796 president Adams signed the Treaty of Tripoli that contained some assertions Palin might have a problem with.

Article 11 reads:

As the Government of the United States of America is not, in any sense, founded on the Christian religion,—as it has in itself no character of enmity against the laws, religion, or tranquility, of Mussulmen,—and as the said States never entered into any war or act of hostility against any Mahometan nation, it is declared by the parties that no pretext arising from religious opinions shall ever produce an interruption of the harmony existing between the two countries.


The US Constitution gives comfort to those who feel religion is an impediment. In Article VI, cl. 3 it states: "No religious test shall be req'd as a qualification to any office of public trust under the United States." If you are looking for evidence of 'original intent' with respect to separation of church and state, that's as good an instance as any.

Efforts to forge a connection between right-wing Christian beliefs and founding principles distorts history, but then where Sarah Palin is concerned that doesn't exactly come as a surprise.


Apr 16, 2010

Jon Stewart slams Fox News hypocrisy

stewart,fox,goldberg

On The Daily Show Jon Stewart does a good job going after Fox News for its frequent half-truths, outright lies and of course the old double-standard that makes a mockery of the claim to be"fair and balanced." There is no end of material to work with, and it just keeps coming.

What got to Stewart on a recent show was the hypocrisy of FOX News' personalities who accuse liberals of "generalized" attacks on the Tea Party movement when FOX and its array of right-wing talking heads engage in gross generalizations and stereotyping of the left on a regular basis.

Fox contributor, Bernie Goldberg, who is down on generalized criticism of the Tea Party movement because of a "few bad actors" has no problem painting liberals with a broad derogatory brush when it suits him. Goldberg told MSNBC's Joe Scarborough that liberals think "that whole middle of the country is made up of sort of jerks. You know, that's a Democratic thing. That's a liberal thing."

Stewart's reaction to the FOX double standard - here.

Criticism of the Tea Party movement isn't just based on generalized impressions, there are incidents like this one for example.

Criticism of the make-up of the movement is also fair game because it's kind of hard to overlook. The way FOX hosts refer fondly to the "American people" doesn't exactly come across as inclusive. When you check out Tea Party gatherings or the audiences that show up on Fox News shows hosted by personalities such as Beck and Huckabee ... what do you see? A bunch of mostly white folk of similar age and appearance. If this is the face of America, it's a retro vision.

The Tea Party movement was never as independent and grassroots as some like to believe. It has more in common with astroturf. A document obtained by Politico suggests the movement has has been co-opted as a Republican fundraising ploy.

Politico:

Joe Wierzbicki, a Republican political consultant with the Sacramento firm Russo Marsh + Rogers, made a proposal to his colleagues that he said could “give a boost to our PAC and position us as a growing force/leading force as the 2010 elections come into focus.”

The proposal... was for a nationwide tea party bus tour, to be called the Tea Party Express, which over the past seven months has become among the most identifiable brands of the tea party movement.


On MSNBC's Countdown With Keith Olberman, Ken Vogel, who broke the story, said that the GOP had successfully "tapped the Tea Party for a sustainable revenue stream."

Faux News double standard


Related post - here

Mar 31, 2010

Toby Keith and LL Cool J get the Fox treatment

Palin,LL Cool J,Toby Keith,FOX

Sarah Palin's media makeover continues apace. "Real American Stories" due to debut on FOX Thursday is being hosted by Palin. Like her upcoming Alaska show on TLC, the emphasis is on character and narrative. FOX describes "Real American Stories" as 'tales about overcoming adversity'. A way to show Palin in a user-friendly light with low gaffe risk.

The show features interviews with various celebs. Seems FOX has has been taking a few high handed liberties. Neither LL Cool J nor Toby Keith were informed that they were scheduled to make an appearance on Palin's show courtesy of recycled interview footage.

On his Twitter page LL posted this message:

Fox lifted an old interview I gave in 2008 to someone else & are misrepresenting to the public in order to promote Sarah Palin's show. WOW


FOX responded by pulling the LL (aka James Todd Smith) segment from the show which airs April 1. Toby Keith's segment still appears to be on schedule.

A FOX spokesperson gave TVNewser this snippy statement: "... it appears that Mr. Smith does not want to be associated with a program that could serve as an inspiration to others, we are cutting his interview from the special and wish him the best with his fledgling acting career."

Not exactly "fledgling". LL's acting career goes back to "Krush Groove" in 1985. He stars in "NCIS: Los Angeles" and has appeared in several movies including "Deep Blue Sea" and "Any Given Sunday".

In Toby Keith's case, same deal. Old footage was revisited with the intention of presenting it as though new. Keith's representative said: "We were never contacted by Fox. I have no idea what interview it's taken from.They're promoting this like it's a brand new interview. He never sat down with Sarah Palin."

Understandably Toby Keith, a registered Democrat, and LL Cool J have had something to say via their spokespersons about the move by FOX. It's kind of like being ambushed. An interview you gave way back ends up being recycled and the next thing you know you're appearing in front of the nation on a show hosted by Sarah Palin. For a lot of people that would be the equivalent of a worst nightmare. Makes you wonder if this is the only way FOX can get big name artists to actually hang with Palin.

In response to a statement from LL Cool J's spokesperson that the interview "was being repurposed without LL's permission", FOX retorted: "Fox News did not commit to restrictions on its interview with Mr. Smith so therefore the network did not need his permission to use the interview in this program."

Link also to Huffington Post - NY Times - MSNBC

Mar 25, 2010

Sarah 'drill baby drill' Palin to host Discovery show

palin

Discovery Channel has brokered a deal with Sarah Palin to host an eight-part documentary about Alaska with the former governor as the central roving attraction. It will be appearing on Discovery's sister network TLC. It's certainly a lucrative arrangement. Palin will reportedly be getting $1 million an episode. The Guardian's Marina Hyde notes that her total take "will clock in at slightly more than it cost to buy the entire state from the Russians in 1867...".

The filmmaker behind the project, reality king Mark Burnett, describes Palin as "a dynamic personality that has captivated millions". According to a Globe and Mail report "Burnett and Palin had been pitching the series to various networks in recent weeks and had been asking for $1.2-million an episode, considered expensive in the world of nonfiction television".

Palin will be in the driver's seat in the sense that it will be a feel good travelogue... Alaska-as-seen-through-her-rimless-Kazuo Kawasakis. Perhaps those interested enough to watch will see Palin taking the opportunity to get in a few digs at her detractors and offer a boost for mining and related activities. But maybe not, TLC seems to be leery of making it political. A spokesperson said: “TLC is about strong characters and compelling narratives, and there is absolutely no intention of making a political program whatsoever”.

Hard to imagine Palin without a political opinion or two while doing the rounds of her home state. The former governor has a record to live down, especially on the environment. Professor Rick Steiner of the University of Alaska provides more detail on Palin's "abysmal" record - here.

Palin is a climate change denier, a proponent of aerial wolf hunting and a big drilling enthusiast. This was a stance she drove home during the election, most famously during the vice-presidential debate with Joe Biden when she made the "drill baby drill" comment.

She will also be showing up on Fox News as an analyst and special commentator. Discovery COO, Peter Ligouri, enthused that "Discovery is so excited to help Sarah Palin tell the story of Alaska...". Interestingly enough Ligouri was former head of Fox Entertainment.

The Palin documentary has come on line at a time when other changes are underway at Discovery. For example the Planet Green network has been moved away from eco-friendly programming. For more on the shift of emphasis check out this NYT piece.

If the thought of watching Palin star in her own reality show is too much for you to stomach, there is always the option of joining a Facebook group protesting Discovery's recent move - here.

Link to related articles - Huffington Post - NY Times - NRDC

Feb 12, 2010

Glenn Beck Show in UK short on ads



There's something weirdly entertaining about guys with cultish personas who spin tall tales, pull funny faces and fill up a chalkboard with apocalyptic hot button terms such as "AntiChrist," "Global Gov in Babylon" and "World washed in blood."

Just a few of the reasons why Glenn Beck is compulsive viewing for millions of Americans who can't get enough of his brand of tabloid analysis. That he's a conspiracy nut and self-described "rodeo clown" only adds to the fascination for some.

So it's no surprise to learn that the Glenn Beck Show has crossed the Atlantic and is now playing in the UK. The British have always had a soft spot for the circus. Seems though that while Brit viewers check out the show, advertisers appear to be much more cautious.

Stopbeck.com reports that even though the Beck show has run ads in the past in the UK, for three days (and counting) this week the show hasn't run any commercials at all... zero. Instead of ads the station cuts to SkyNews updates or the weather.

More companies are thinking twice about having their ads associated with the font-of-misinformation that is Glenn Beck... known for off-the-wall remarks of the 'Barack Obama is a racist' variety. There will always be takers of course, but they are less numerous.

When explaining why her company had chosen to pass on Beck, Sargento spokesperson Barbara Gannon told the conservative Business and Media Institute that “we do not want to be associated with hateful speech used by either liberal or conservative television hosts.”

In total Beck has lost over 100 sponsors in both the US and the UK. The list of companies who have dropped his show (and/or Fox News ) can be found here.

Jan 19, 2010

Foxy Lady: Palin goes rabid



It's kind of like one of those perfect match-ups touted by eHarmony. Sarah Palin will be joining Fox News as an analyst and special commentator.

Fox and Palin are in many ways made for each other. Like Fox, Palin is heavily biased, factually challenged, hype prone and not troubled by the occasional fast one. Like Fox she appeals to a brand of patriotism that is anti-intellectual, big on flag pins and that conjures an America of Joe sixpacks and hockey moms.

Maybe given her savaging at the hands of the evil "liberal media" Fox sees an opportunity to stick Palin in the face of liberal America like a middle finger. No doubt her detractors in 'not-real' America won't be able to resist sneaking a peek. It's free entertainment after all, and Sarah's always good for a laugh. This will be Fox's chance to show the world that Palin can pronounce complicated words like "Uzbekistan" and that she possesses in-depth knowledge about esoteric places like um... Russia. As she informed Katie Couric, she's an omnivorous reader. There isn't a magazine she hasn't scanned. She's read "all of 'em, any of 'em that have been in front of me all these years". Just don't ask her for a title.

Recently she was interviewed by Fox News jester Glenn Beck with the Statue of Liberty in the background (John Stewart took aim - here). Beck was his usual smarmy, oleaginous self as he talked about his Fox-nation-version-of-America... the one without too many brown people. Palin cranked out her thoughts in that mechanical, rehearsed voice... how grand America is... how it risks regressing to become European-like. You get the feeling when she talks that her mind and her delivery risk becoming unshackled. It adds to the suspense.

Palin has found her niche. It doesn't matter if she makes things up now and then, she'll fit right in on faux news. Making things up on Fox isn't a problem, Beck has made lying into a political art form. As long as you're singing from the right song sheet you can pretty much feel free to shoot the bull. And Palin does make things up. Last year in an effort to explain why as president she wouldn't be subjected to the types of ethics investigations that prompted her Alaska resignation, she referred to a non-existent "department" in the White House:

"I think on a national level your Department of Law there in the White House would look at some of the things that we've been charged with and automatically throw them out."


Given Palin's history of gaffes and meltdowns, Fox will likely try and showcase her dubious talents in a manner that isn't high risk. Going head-to-head with policy wonks and getting into it with hired liberals on a free-for-all basis could prove costly. Fact-challenged Palin is an easy target and could come off looking well... stupid. Emphasis will likely be on the "special" part of her designated commentator role. That would give her more control, make her look smarter and reduce the risk factor.

Palin's new gig has already gotten a few laughs. In reference to her Fox role she announced in all seriousness: "It's wonderful to be part of a place that so values fair and balanced news."

Fox news: a few ideas for a Palin show


Related story - here

Jun 10, 2009

Bill Maher calls Sean Hannity 'sexually repressed'

Photobucket

During an interview with Howard Kurtz on CNN's "Reliable Sources," Bill Maher said Sean Hannity of Fox News is "terribly sexually repressed." Maher made the comment after viewing a video clip, in the course of which Hannity described him (Maher) as being "an angry, bitter guy."

Here's how Maher responded during the Kurtz interview:

MAHER: No, he's an angry, bitter guy. That's called projecting.

That's called taking what you feel and giving it to somebody else. I'm a happy, single guy. He's a repressed, typical Republican.

I'm sure just terribly sexually repressed and it comes out in all their sorts of hatred and vile and bile -- why would I be bitter? First of all, our side won. You know, their side is in a wilderness like there's been before.

So --


Sexual repression is just part of a more complex condition in Hannity's case, that might best be described as a form of arrested development.

He is typical of a certain type of right wing pundit... loud, driven, smug, dogmatic, intellectually challenged and programmed to repeat the same key talking points ad nauseum. It doesn't matter if he is out-to-lunch and factually incorrect on some issue, the ideological hype and will-to-coerce never wavers - you have at least to give him an 'A' for effort.

Watching Hannity doing his thing can be funny as hell, but also disturbing.

The other night he had guests on his show who also lean to the right, but when Hannity started banging on even they looked at him as though he had a screw loose. He hammered home objections to everything Obama is about with such thinly disguised contempt or possibly hatred, it seemed badly off-base.

Notwithstanding Hannity's often proclaimed regard for conservative African American justice Clarence Thomas, his attacks on Obama at times come off as nasty and personal in a manner that goes beyond the White House policies under discussion. There is an undertone to Hannity's commentary on Obama that says as much about prejudice as it does about politics.

He doggedly referred to the president in the third person... "he" and "him"... you half expected him to start throwing in the occasional "it."

On a recent show, with reference to the Cairo visit he said in all seriousness that Obama was now referring to America as "a Muslim nation."

What president Obama in fact said is that millions of Muslims live in America. We're not talking some big secret here. Any reference to America being a 'Muslim nation' has to be kept in the context of the overall remarks. But leave it to Hannity to wrench Obama's comments out of context and present them in a manner that completely distorts what the president was saying.

Obama's precise words were:

We do not consider ourselves a Christian nation, or a Jewish nation, or a Muslim nation. We consider ourselves a nation of citizens, who are bound by ideals.

If you actually took the number of Muslim Americans, we'd be one of the largest Muslim countries in the world.

This is the spin Hannity put on it:

He honors the national day of prayer behind closed doors. Now, on his Middle East apology tour, the President calls the U.S. a "Muslim nation."

The same president who insists the U.S. is not a Christian nation is now calling us a Muslim nation.


When Bill Maher, who has a good eye for these things, says Hannity is sexually repressed there is no doubt he has hit on one of Hannity's chief features... yet another right-wing Irish-American Catholic with the hang-ups that go with it. It's pretty evident who the "angry, bitter guy" is.

Sean Hannity really shouldn't go after Bill Maher. They're badly mismatched. Maher is just way too sharp for the Fox News shill.

Jun 1, 2009

Tiller killing: was Bill O'Reilly's inflammatory rhetoric a factor?

Bill O'Reilly

Dr George Tiller was gunned down Sunday in the Reformation Lutheran Church, Wichita Kansas, where he was serving as an usher.

Dr Tiller performed abortions and was a champion of women's reproductive freedom despite the risk to his own life. He had long been vilified by anti-abortion activists who made him a target of ongoing threats.

No detractor's voice was louder than that of Fox News' inquisitor-in-chief, Bill O'Reilly.

O'Reilly first got Tiller in his sights back in 2005. According to Salon, the doctor's name surfaced on O'Reilly's show, The Factor, on 28 subsequent episodes - most recently on April 27 of this year.

The on-air attacks on Dr Tiller included O'Reilly's usual brand of hardline rhetoric - the type of inflammatory stuff guaranteed to rile up most anti-abortion activists.

Dr Tiller was crudely caricatured as "Tiller the Baby Killer." Other characterizations were a variation on that theme. The doctor was likened to the Nazis... his work was described as the moral equivalent of NAMBLA and Al Qaeda... comparisons were also made with Mao's China, Hitler's Germany and Stalin's Soviet Union in the course of the broad brush smear job that is part of O'Reilly's on-air attack style.

O'Reilly deliberately associated Dr Tiller with child molestation and rape and without evidence accused his clinic of covering up for 'child rapists.' He claimed the doctor was being enabled by amoral cultural elites and scofflaw journalists. Tiller's clinic was described as a "death mill."

O'Reilly's attacks on George Tiller weren't just on-air targeting. He dispatched producers Jesse Watters and Porter Barry to ambush the doctor. The ambush 'interviews' also extended to Tiller's attorney, Pedro Irigonegaray and Kansas governor, Kathleen Sebelius.

O'Reilly presented the doctor as a murderer-on-the-loose running a "business of destruction". He described him as having "blood on his hands" and used terms such as "Judgment Day."

While O'Reilly never went so far as advocating violence, the act of targeting George Tiller in this highly sensationalist fashion offered the doctor up as a hate-target - intentional or not. This was playing with fire since elements in the anti-abortion movement have a history of violence - including shootings and bombings directed against abortion providers.

Authorities have detained a suspect, 51-year-old Scott Roeder in connection with the killing of Dr Tiller. Roeder was reportedly a one-time member of a Shawnee County-based Freemen group called One Supreme Court.

Suzanne James, a former director of victim's services for Shawnee County remembers Roeder and described him as "dangerous."

A person using the name Scott Roeder was responsible for posting anti-Tiller comments on various internet sites. A posting from September 3, 2007, on a site sponsored by Operation Rescue, said that Tiller needed to be "stopped."

Was O'Reilly's campaign against George Tiller a factor in the final tragic outcome? No doubt O'Reilly will condemn the murder and express sympathy for Tiller's family - but the fact remains, he contributed to the climate of hate that resulted in Tiller being made into enemy number-one in the minds of some people. In that type of climate a shooter might not only feel empowered, but justified.

For details on the suspect Scott Roeder here.

Salon article on O'Reilly's attacks on Tiller here.

Apr 11, 2009

Fox News tea party support: 'fair and balanced' a joke

Photobucket

Conservative "tea party" protests across the US need to attract crowds. Bodies are essential if you hope to draw media attention.

No problem. Fox News is on the case.

The News organization that claims to be "fair and balanced" and that urges viewers to "say 'no' to biased media" has made no effort to disguise its biases when it comes to anti-Obama tea party protests. Fox blatantly airs segments urging viewers to get involved in protests across the country.

Fox goes beyond merely calling on viewers to turn out. It provides organizing information for the events ... dates, locations, related website info. It has even gone so far as to post publicity for the events on its own website. Tea-party planners list Fox News contributors as "Tea Party Sponsors".

Fox personalities will be broadcasting live at tea party events across the country.

Beck has been working overtime getting out the message. He encouraged his viewers to show up at "FNC Tax Day Tea Parties". Cavuto announced on his show that "... we are going to be broadcasting live from one of the biggest of these rallies on April 15, Tax Day. We are at California's state capitol in Sacramento. This is the epicenter of this tax revolt beast, if you will."

Fox News' claim to be fair and balanced is a joke.

Fox News: tea party central




Related story - here

Nov 29, 2008

Michael Wolff book: Rupert Murdoch 'despises' Bill O'Reilly

Photobucket

It's one thing for FOX news bully boy Bill O'Reilly to take flack from the left, he's used to that. But when criticism comes from the boardroom of News Corp., and from upper echelons of FOX itself, it's another matter.

Politico received a pre-publication copy of Michael Wolff's upcoming biography of Rupert Murdoch, titled The Man Who Owns the News. Turns out that Murdoch is embarrassed by his ownership of FOX news. In addition, he "absolutely despises" Bill O'Reilly.

It is not just Murdoch (and everybody else at News Corp.’s highest levels) who absolutely despises Bill O’Reilly, the bullying, mean-spirited, and hugely successful evening commentator,” Wolff wrote, “but [Fox News chief executive] Roger Ailes himself who loathes him. Success, however, has cemented everyone to each other.


According to Wolff, Murdoch's purchase of the Wall Street Journal was motivated in part by a desire to distance himself from the "the belligerent, the vulgar, the menacing, the unsubtle ... for the better-heeled, the more magnanimous, the further nuanced."

O'Reilly epitomizes a certain type of macho bravado with his almost pathological control needs and intimidation tactics. He's a journalistic thug with a big following. When he brings on comedian-of-sorts Dennis Miller it's kind of like watching two middle-aged self-congratulatory smart asses pleasuring each other and it's not pretty.

O'Reilly appeals to people out there who like his authoritarian ways. They get off on watching him savage liberals or jumping all over people he loves to hate, such as Barney Frank.

Bill O'Reilly is an old dog who will never learn new tricks and he's reaching his expiry date fast. It's ironical though that Murdoch of all people, is embarrassed by the Factor host. Perhaps advancing years have a way of mellowing out even cynical and hard nosed news hustlers.

The Wolff revelations create a perception problem for O'Reilly because it's not just liberals doing the dissing.

Nov 11, 2008

Greta Van Susteren's softball Palin interview

Palin

FOX's Greta Van Susteren recently made the trip to Alaska to interview Sarah Palin. During the interview in Anchorage, Van Susteren might as well have been a paid partisan hired to make Palin look good, while enjoying some moose chili and snowmobiling on the side.

To hear Palin tell it during the interview, she barely set a foot wrong during the campaign.

When she was strutting her stuff on the trail controversy erupted about her pricey new outfits. She announced that the clothes were RNC property, but that didn't prevent some of the clothing ending up on the plane back to Alaska.

According to Palin the controversial wardrobe just kind of 'appeared.' She never asked for a single thread. In fact she and Todd would have been happy just to have worn their regular outfits on the campaign trail because they like nothing more than being their authentic Alaskan selves.

Palin was unprepared for the big stage. She lacked knowledge in key areas. But she doesn't see it that way, and instead blames the mean liberal media and faceless "jerks" associated with the McCain campaign.

Then of course there is the God factor. In the interview there was lots of false humility, but she made it clear that come 2012 the decision is in God's hands. If she gets the nod from the big guy, she will open the door. God only has to signal that it's her time.

At various points during the interview Palin put herself forward as a uniter, someone with the good of her country at heart. Strange to hear considering the vicious attacks she launched against Barack Obama and the hatred she whipped up at her rallies. When she talked about the virtues of "getting along," Van Susteren asked her how she proposed to do that.

She replied:

“You start by not discrediting or invalidating someone because of a position that maybe they take that you are in disagreement with. You learn from them and you're able to find middle ground on so many of these issues... There is always a way to work with another person... Maybe we disagree on some of the particulars on an issue. We don't have to be screamin' at each other, though. Let's find a way to work together and solve a problem.”

Aspects of the governor's track record give the lie to this, but Van Susteren didn't challenge Palin on her assertions.

The interview was more of a 'feel good' exercise than any genuine effort to challenge Palin on the facts. For the most part Van Susteren took what the governor had to say at face value, and at times almost offered her an open mike. With the exception of a few questions designed to appear tough, the interview was softball journalism.

Oct 11, 2008

John Cleese pens an ode to Sean Hannity

John Cleese

John Cleese of Monty Python's Flying Circus, has turned his talents to poetry. Recently he penned an 'Ode to Sean Hannity.' It perfectly captures the essential inanity of the right wing motormouth.

The show Hannity and Colmes
seems designed to perpetuate Fox's fairness fiction. The unbalanced Hannity being counterbalanced by the more liberal-leaning and balanced Colmes. Colmes is by far the brighter light, which isn't hard given the competition.

The balance proves elusive though because Colmes can barely get a word in edgeways. Hannity routinely hogs the camera and assaults viewers with his dogged line of commentary - working every topic to death like a dog with a bone.

The Cleese poem captures the essence of Hannity with a few well chosen words.


Ode to Sean Hannity
by John Cleese

Aping urbanity
Oozing with vanity
Plump as a manatee
Faking humanity
Journalistic calamity
Intellectual inanity
Fox Noise insanity
You’re a profanity
Hannity

Aug 14, 2008

Fox News describes right wing extremist Paul Fromm as a "free speech activist"

Paul Fromm

Fox News recently saw fit to solicit the opinions of far-right extremist Paul Fromm when airing a segment on Mark Steyn's Human Rights Tribunal drama in Canada.

In brief ... Canadian Human Rights Tribunals acted on complaints after excerpts from Steyn's fantasy novel book - America Alone: The End of the World as we Know It - appeared in Macleans magazine. The book showcases Steyn's paranoid views supported by suspect stats and demographic projections.

Two of the HR cases have been dismissed, but a Tribunal in British Columbia is still weighing the charge of hate speech against Muslims.

Steyn's outing in Macleans magazine only became headlines because of complaints by incensed members of the Muslim community. While their feelings are entirely understandable, it was unwise to conflate the incident into a drama in which Steyn could play the persecuted victim. On a recent appearance on TVO he was crying the blues - referring to the death threats he has received and how he doesn't want to be a martyr.

The offended, rather than seek human rights relief, should have used the media and their own publishing vehicles to hit back - and left it at that.

In calling upon Fromm, Fox News was in a sense doing Steyn's detractors a favor. Suspicions that the pundit is a bigoted jerk with a gift for satire, tends to take on additional weight when Fromm - a Nazi sympathizing, Holocaust-denying Jew hater - is called upon to go to bat for Steyn in order to explain Canada's tendencies toward 'speech suppression.'

Fox referred to Fromm as a "free speech activist" - a rather high sounding term for a neo-Nazi with Klan connections. Fromm has referred to a Muslim woman as "a hag in a bag." Rallies he has attended included chants such as "nigger, nigger, nigger ... out, out, out."

An Alternet article has more:

"Besides running his own extremist group in Canada -- the Canada First Immigration Reform Committee -- Fromm is a national director of the white supremacist Council of Conservative Citizens, a group that believes in "racial integrity" and views blacks as a "retrograde species of humanity." Fromm is also a signatory to a 2004 hate group protocol calling for an alliance between various racist and anti-Semitic groups, including David Duke's European-American Unity and Rights Organization and the neo-Nazi National Alliance."

Offensive and wrong though Steyn can be on the subject of Islam, Fromm takes it to another level entirely. For Fox to summon this hater to comment on Steyn's case and to further credit Fromm with the mantle of "free speech activist," tells us at least something about where Fox is coming from.

Jul 22, 2008

Bill O'Reilly calls Netroots Nation more hateful than the Klan

Photobucket

Former US Vice-President, Al Gore, showed up last Saturday at the Netroots Nation convention in Austin, Texas. Netroots is a political convention for progressive political activists. It is organized by Daily Kos, and was previously known as Yearly Kos.

In referring to Netroots Nation, Gore described it as: "The beginning of an effort ... to reclaim the integrity of American democracy.”

The presence of Gore at the convention tripped the wire of Fox News Bill O'Reilly, who went off on one of his tirades. He described Netroots Nation as the most "hateful group in the country." He went on to say: “And I’m including the Nazis and the Klan in here.”

Last year he described the Yearly Kos conference as "a David Duke convention." Hate is something O'Reilly understands. He routinely demonizes his opponents while pretending to be fair and balanced.

A cursory read of Kos will yield passionate arguments, informed commentary. Daily Kos is a huge site and hosts a massive number of comments. O'Reilly has no way of proving that any "hateful" remarks have any connection to Netroots Nation members. They could well have been planted by malicious trolls in an effort to blacken the site's reputation.

O'Reilly has said that 'whatever is on your site represents you,' He conveniently overlooks hate comments on his own site, that can get as bad as anything you will ever find on Kos.

In one case on O'Reilly's site there were not-so-veiled threats against the life of Hillary Clinton. One comment included the remark "keeping my guns loaded" - in reference to the possible election of Hillary Clinton as president.

John Aravosis discovered that the person who made this comment had written 1,062 posts on O'Reilly's site - so he/she was a regular and not a passing troll.

O'Reilly's self-righteous pomposity knows no bounds. He said:

"Al Gore now is done. He’s done. Ok. He is not a man of respect, he doesn’t have any judgment. The fact that he went to this thing is the same as if he stepped into the Klan gathering. It’s the same. No difference. None. K, he loses all credibility with me. All credibility."


Someone who thinks Netroots Nation is more hateful than the Nazis and the Klu Klux Klan clearly has a screw loose... not exactly a drawback on Fox News.

Mar 3, 2008

Bill O'Reilly compares blog comment with Goebbel's propaganda

Bill O'Reilly is always reliably himself. Always reliably smug, flash, complacent, accusing, cynical, smirking - depending on what piece of raw meat has been tossed into his cage on a given day.

He creates the impression that he's nailing it all down when he talks, even though he may be using a sledgehammer to crack a walnut. He's fly when it comes to playing on popular fears and prejudices - knows what buttons to push to generate a reaction. None of this though has anything to do with being fair and balanced. It has to do with O'Reilly, his agenda and his ego. Calling his line of commentary "fair and balanced" is a joke.

O'Reilly's interest in any given news story depends on the degree of prejudice it whips up in him. He thinks nothing of using the Nazi or KKK reference to smear opponents. Stretching a far-fetched comparison to the max isn't a problem for him. It doesn't matter how idiotic the comparison is so long as it produces the required sensation value.

The other day he had a go at Arianna Huffington.

O'Reilly got heated because a commentator on one of HuffPo's many comment threads made some disparaging reference to Nancy Reagan. The remark included the wish that she suffer terribly before dying.

In the build-up to his attack, O'Reilly dragged up Nazi attempts to demonize the Jews. He then went on to suggest that the comment about Nancy Reagan made HuffPo no different from the Nazi propaganda employed by Joseph Goebbels, Reich Minister for Enlightenment and Propaganda. This knee-jerk comparison would draw accusations of "moron" in the company of sane people, but O'Reilly carries on like this on the public airwaves and then has the audacity to describe his brand of lunacy as "fair and balanced".

Channeling one of the darkest periods of modern history in order to make a point about a random comment on a blog thread isn't just unbalanced, it is the type of overkill that draws attention back to O'Reilly. You seriously wonder if the guy is right in the head.

O'Reilly's tactics could come straight out of the Nazi playbook. He routinely distorts the facts, blurs reality and caricatures his opponents in an effort to ram home his smear-of-the-day ... which is precisely what the Nazis did.

Maybe Bill's feeling the heat these days. A new wind is blowing in America, and his brand of polarizing journalism is starting to seem kind of old.